Forum
Implantologicum

May 6, 2026
// 13 min

Contemporary Choice of Materials and Fabrication Methods for Implant Overdentures

Lucia K.
Zaugg
Nicola U.
Zitzmann
Nadja
Rohr

Alexakou, E., Damanaki, M., Zoidis, P., Bakiri, E., Mouzis, N., Smidt, G., & Kourtis, S. PEEK High performance polymers: A review of properties and clinical applications in prosthodontics and restorative dentistry. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2019;27:113-121.

Altarazi, A., Haider, J., Alhotan, A., Silikas, N., & Devlin, H. Assessing the physical and mechanical properties of 3D printed acrylic material for denture base application. Dent Mater 2022;38:1841-1854.

Baba, N. Z., AlRumaih, H. S., Goodacre, B. J., & Goodacre, C. J. Current techniques in CAD/CAM denture fabrication. Gen Dent 2016;64: 23-28.

Baba, N. Z., Goodacre, B. J., Goodacre, C. J., Muller, F., & Wagner, S. CAD/CAM Complete denture systems and physical properties: A review of the literature. J Prosthodont 2021;30:113-124.

Barao, V. A., Assuncao, W. G., Tabata, L. F., de Sousa, E. A., & Rocha, E. P. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2008;92:213-223.

Bertotti, K., Mwenge-Wambel, J., Sireix, C., Hue, O., Jeannin, C., & Grosgogeat, B. Accurate analysis of titanium and PolyEtherEtherKetone materials as an alternative to cobalt-chrome framework in removable partial denture: A systematic review. Dent Mater 2024;40:1854-1861.

Bieger, V., Thieringer, F. M., Fischer, J., & Rohr, N. Fibroblast behavior on conventionally processed, milled, and printed occlusal device materials with different surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 2023;129:939-945.

Bilgin, M. S., Baytaroglu, E. N., Erdem, A., & Dilber, E. A review of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacture techniques for removable denture fabrication. Eur J Dent 2016;10:286-291.

Boven, G. C., Raghoebar, G. M., Vissink, A., & Meijer, H. J. Improving masticatory performance, bite force, nutritional state and patient’s satisfaction with implant overdentures: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil 2015;42:220-233.

Cherneva, S. P., V.; Petkov, V.; Bogdanov, V.; Simeonova, S. Microstructure and mechanical properties of 3D-printed dental Co-Cr alloys, produced with the use of selective laser melting. Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics 2024;25:29-40.

de Freitas, B. N., Tonin, B. S. H., Zaparolli, D., Faria, A. C. L., Toniollo, M. B., Ribeiro, R. F., & Macedo, A. P. Mechanical comparison of milled fiber-reinforced resin composite and Co-Cr frameworks with different connector cross-sectional geometries: An in vitro study. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2023;141:105759.

Deeban, Y. Effectiveness of CAD-CAM milled versus DMLS titanium frameworks for hybrid denture prosthesis: A narrative review. J Funct Biomater 2024;15:376.

Duncan, J. P., Freilich, M. A., & Latvis, C. J. (2000). Fiber-reinforced composite framework for implant-supported overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:200-204.

Eggmann, F., & Blatz, M. B. Recent advances in intraoral scanners. J Dent Res 2024;103:1349-1357.

El-Shaheed, N. H., Lamfon, H. A., Salama, R. I., Faramawy, A. M. G., & Mostafa, A. Z. H. Tissue surface adaptation and clinical performance of CAD-CAM milled versus conventional implant-assisted mandibular overdenture. Int J Dent 2022;8220233.

Ellakany, P., Madi, M., Elwan, A. H., Alshehri, T., Aljubran, H., & Aly, N. M. Influence of CAD-CAM manufacturing methods on the accuracy and mechanical properties of implant-supported prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthodont 2024 [in press].

Fouda, S., Ji, W., Gad, M. M., AlGhamdi, M. A., & Rohr, N. Flexural strength and surface properties of 3d-printed denture base resins-effect of build angle, layer thickness and aging. Materials (Basel) 2025;18:913.

Gama, L. T., Bezerra, A. P., Schimmel, M., Rodrigues Garcia, R. C. M., de Luca Canto, G., & Goncalves, T. Clinical performance of polymer frameworks in dental prostheses: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2024;131:579-590.

Gomaa, A. M., Mostafa, A. Z. H., & El-Shaheed, N. H. Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life for four implant-assisted mandibular overdentures fabricated with CAD/CAM milled poly methyl methacrylate, CAD/CAM-milled poly ether ether ketone, or conventional poly methyl methacrylate: A crossover clinical trial. J Oral Rehabil 2023;50:566-579.

Goodacre, B. J., & Goodacre, C. J. Additive manufacturing for complete denture fabrication: A narrative review. J Prosthodont 2022;31:47-51.

Hack, G., Liberman, L., Vach, K., Tchorz, J. P., Kohal, R. J., & Patzelt, S. B. M. Computerized optical impression making of edentulous jaws – An in vivo feasibility study. J Prosthodont Res 2020;64:444-453.

Heydecke, G., Boudrias, P., Awad, M. A., De Albuquerque, R. F., Lund, J. P., & Feine, J. S. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:125-130.

Khorasani, E., Mokhlesi, A., Arzani, S., Ghodsi, S., & Mosaddad, S. A. Are there clinical differences between 3d-printed and milled complete dentures? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Dent J 2025;75:464-473.

Le Bars, P., Bandiaky, O. N., Le Guehennec, L., Clouet, R., & Kouadio, A. A. Different polymers for the base of removable dentures? Part I: A narrative review of mechanical and physical properties. Polymers (Basel) 2023;15:3495.

Lee, W. J., Jo, Y. H., Yilmaz, B., & Yoon, H. I. (2023). Effect of layer thickness, build angle, and viscosity on the mechanical properties and manufacturing trueness of denture base resin for digital light processing. J Dent 2023;135:104598.

Li, P., Lambart, A. L., Stawarczyk, B., Reymus, M., & Spintzyk, S. Postpolymerization of a 3D-printed denture base polymer: Impact of post-curing methods on surface characteristics, flexural strength, and cytotoxicity. J Dent 2021;115:103856.

Murakami, N., Wakabayashi, N., Matsushima, R., Kishida, A., & Igarashi, Y. Effect of high-pressure polymerization on mechanical properties of PMMA denture base resin. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2013;20:98-104.

Nabil, M. S., Mahanna, F. F., & Said, M. M. Evaluation of masticatory performance and patient satisfaction for conventional and 3D-printed implant overdentures: a randomized crossover study. BMC Oral Health 2024;24:672.

Park, K., Kang, N. G., Lee, J. H., & Srinivasan, M. Removable complete denture with a metal base: Integration of digital design and conventional fabrication techniques. J Esthet Restor Dent 2024;36:255-262.

Revilla-Leon, M., Sadeghpour, M., & Ozcan, M. A review of the applications of additive manufacturing technologies used to fabricate metals in implant dentistry. J Prosthodont 2020;29:579-593.

Sadowsky, S. J., & Zitzmann, N. U. Protocols for the maxillary implant overdenture: A systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:182-191.

Şahin N, K. N., Tekin EN. Attachment systems in implant-supported removable dentures: Update for clinicians. Lokman Hekim Health Sci 2024;4:114-120.

Saravi, B., Ilbertz, J., Vach, K., Kohal, R. J., & Patzelt, S. B. M. Accuracy of computerized optical impression making in fabrication of removable dentures for partially edentulous jaws: An in vivo feasibility study. J Funct Biomater 2023;14:458.

Schmidt, M. B., Rauch, A., Schwarzer, M., Lethaus, B., & Hahnel, S. Combination of digital and conventional workflows in the CAD/CAM-fabrication of an implant-supported overdenture. Materials (Basel) 2020;13:3688.

Shim, J. S., Kim, J. E., Jeong, S. H., Choi, Y. J., & Ryu, J. J. Printing accuracy, mechanical properties, surface characteristics, and microbial adhesion of 3D-printed resins with various printing orientations. J Prosthet Dent 2020;124:468-475.

Stilwell, C., Jung R., Beuer, F., Brunello, G., Cha, J., Chua Keng Ling, …, Zitzmann, N.U. Consensus report of Group 4 of the 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla: conventional dentures, implant overdentures and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research 2025; [under review].

Suzaki, N., Yamaguchi, S., Hirose, N., Tanaka, R., Takahashi, Y., Imazato, S., & Hayashi, M. Evaluation of physical properties of fiber-reinforced composite resin. Dent Mater 2020;36:987-996.

Van de Winkel, T., Delfos, F., van Oirschot, B., Maal, T., Adang, E., & Meijer, G. budget impact analysis: digital workflow significantly reduces costs of implant supported overdentures (IODs). Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2025;27:e13413.

Van de Winkel, T., Heijens, L., Listl, S., & Meijer, G. What is the evidence on the added value of implant-supported overdentures? A review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2021;23:644-656.

Vincze, Z. E., Nagy, L., Kelemen, K., Cavalcante, B. G. N., Gede, N., Hegyi, P., . . . Marton, K. Milling has superior mechanical properties to other fabrication methods for PMMA denture bases: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Dent Mater 2025;41:366-382.

Wei, X., Pan, Y., Wang, M., Wang, Y., Lin, H., Jiang, L., …, Cheng, H. Comparative analysis of leaching residual monomer and biological effects of four types of conventional and CAD/CAM dental polymers: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2022;26:2887-2898.

Wong, D. M., Cheng, L. Y., Chow, T. W., & Clark, R. K. Effect of processing method on the dimensional accuracy and water sorption of acrylic resin dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:300-304.

Yan, L., Xie, B., Li, Y., Liu, Z., Huang, Y., He, B., …, Chen, F. Global burden of oral disorders with projections over the next 30 years. J Periodontol 2025; [in press] doi:10.1002/JPER.24-0638.

Zhou, Y., Li, N., Yan, J., & Zeng, Q. Comparative analysis of the microstructures and mechanical properties of Co-Cr dental alloys fabricated by different methods. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:617-623.

Zitzmann, N. U., & Marinello, C. P. Treatment plan for restoring the edentulous maxilla with implant-supported restorations: removable overdenture versus fixed partial denture design. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:188-196.

Zitzmann, N. U., & Marinello, C. P. A review of clinical and technical considerations for fixed and removable implant prostheses in the edentulous mandible. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:65-72.