Aootaphao S, Thongvigitmanee SS, Puttawibul P, Thajchayapong P. Truncation effect reduction for fast iterative reconstruction in cone-beam CT. BMC Med Imaging 2022;22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-022-00881-8.
Armanious K, Jiang C, Fischer M, Küstner T, Hepp T, Nikolaou K, et al. MedGAN: Medical image translation using GANs. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics 2020;79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2019.101684.
Bornstein MM, Horner K, Jacobs R. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Periodontol 2000 2017;73:51–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12161.
Candemil AP, Salmon B, Freitas DQ, Ambrosano GM, Haiter-Neto F, Oliveira ML. Metallic materials in the exomass impair cone beam CT voxel values. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2018;47:20180011. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180011.
Candemil AP, Salmon B, Freitas DQ, Ambrosano GMB, Haiter-Neto F, Oliveira ML. Are metal artefact reduction algorithms effective to correct cone beam CT artefacts arising from the exomass? Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2019;48:20180290. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180290.
Coelho-Silva F, Cascante-Sequeira D, Réa MT, Oliveira ML, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F, et al. High-density objects in exomass affect the volume of high-density objects inside the field of view. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2023;53:153–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twad014.
Coelho-Silva F, Martins LAC, Braga DA, Zandonade E, Haiter-Neto F, de-Azevedo-Vaz SL. Influence of windowing and metal artefact reduction algorithms on the volumetric dimensions of five different high-density materials: A cone-beam CT study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2020;49. https://doi.org/10.1259/DMFR.20200039.
Cruz-Bastida JP, Moncada F, Martínez-Dávalos A, Rodríguez-Villafuerte M. Task-based transferable deep-learning scatter correction in cone beam computed tomography: a simulation study. Journal of Medical Imaging 2024;11. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.11.2.024006.
da Fonte JBM, Fontenele RC, Farias-Gomes A, Ruiz DC, Andrade-Bortoletto MFS, Sousa Melo SL, Freitas DQ. Do the number of zirconia implants and the thickness of CBCT image reconstruction affect the detection of peri-implant bone defect? A diagnostic accuracy ex vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2024; 35:1485–92. https://doi.org10.1111/clr.14336. Epub 2024 Jul 27. PMID: 39072795.
Demirturk Kocasarac H, Koenig LJ, Ustaoglu G, Oliveira ML, Freitas DQ. CBCT image artefacts generated by implants located inside the field of view or in the exomass. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2022;51. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20210092.
Elgarba BM, Van Aelst S, Swaity A, Morgan N, Shujaat S, Jacobs R. Deep learning-based segmentation of dental implants on cone-beam computed tomography images: A validation study. J Dent 2023;137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104639.
Elgarba Bahaaeldeen M, Fontenele RC, Ali S, Swaity A, Meeus J, Shujaat S, et al. Validation of a novel AI-based automated multimodal image registration of CBCT and intraoral scan aiding presurgical implant planning. Clin Oral Implants Res 2024;35:1506–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14338.
Elgarba Bahaaeldeen M, Fontenele RC, Mangano F, Jacobs R. Novel AI-based automated virtual implant placement: Artificial versus human intelligence. J Dent 2024;147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105146.
Fontenele RC, Nascimento EHL, Imbelloni-Vasconcelos AC, Martins LAC, Pontual ADA, Ramos-Perez FMM, Freitas DQ. Influence of kilovoltage-peak and the metal artifact reduction tool in cone-beam computed tomography on the detection of bone defects around titanium-zirconia and zirconia implants. Imaging Sci Dent 2022;52:267–73. https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20220040.
Fontenele RC, Nascimento EHL, Vasconcelos T V., Noujeim M, Freitas DQ. Magnitude of cone beam CT image artifacts related to zirconium and titanium implants: Impact on image quality. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2018;47. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180021.
Freitas DQ, Vasconcelos TV, Noujeim M. Diagnosis of vertical root fracture in teeth close and distant to implant: an in vitro study to assess the influence of artifacts produced in cone beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2019;23:1263–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2558-z.
Fuglsig JM de C e. S, Reis INR dos, Yeung AWK, Bornstein MM, Spin-Neto R. The current role and future potential of digital diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry: A scoping review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2024;35:793–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14212.
Gonzalez-Passos T, Barros-Costa M, Oliveira ML, Freitas DQ. Influence of tube current and metal artifact reduction on the diagnosis of external cervical resorption in teeth adjacent to a dental implant in CBCT: an ex-vivo study. Clin Oral Investig 2024;28:356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-024-05750-y.
Gottschalk TM, Maier A, Kordon F, Kreher BW. DL-based inpainting for metal artifact reduction for cone beam CT using metal path length information. Med Phys 2023;50:128–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.15909.
Hung K, Montalvao C, Tanaka R, Kawai T, Bornstein MM. The use and performance of artificial intelligence applications in dental and maxillofacial radiology: A systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2020;49:20190107. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20190107.
Hung KF, Yeung AWK, Bornstein MM, Schwendicke F. Personalized dental medicine, artificial intelligence, and their relevance for dentomaxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2023;52. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20220335.
Hunter AK, McDavid WD. Characterization and correction of cupping effect artefacts in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;41:217–23. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/19015946.
Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health 2018;18:88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5.
Kuusisto N, Abushahba F, Syrjänen S, Huumonen S, Vallittu P, Närhi T. Zirconia implants interfere with the evaluation of peri-implant bone defects in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images even with artifact reduction, a pilot study. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2023;52. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20230252.
Lee JH, Kim YT, Lee J Bin. Identification of dental implant systems from low-quality and distorted dental radiographs using AI trained on a large multi-center dataset. Sci Rep 2024;14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63422-z.
Mureșanu S, Almășan O, Hedeșiu M, Dioșan L, Dinu C, Jacobs R. Artificial intelligence models for clinical usage in dentistry with a focus on dentomaxillofacial CBCT: a systematic review. Oral Radiol 2023;39:18–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-022-00660-9.
Oliveira ML, Candemil AP, Freitas DQ, Haiter-Neto F, Wenzel A, Spin-Neto R. Objective assessment of the combined effect of exomass-related- and motion artefacts in cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2021;50:20200255. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20200255.
Oliveira ML, Dagassan-Berndt D, Sampaio-Oliveira M, Simonek M, Kühl S, Bornstein MM. Evaluation of exomass-related artefacts caused by dental implants of different materials in cone-beam computed tomography scans: an ex vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2024 Dec 20. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14394.
Oliveira ML, Schaub S, Dagassan-Berndt D, Bieder F, Cattin PC, Bornstein MM. Development and evaluation of a deep learning model to reduce exomass-related metal artefacts in cone-beam computed tomography: an ex-vivo study using porcine mandibles. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2024. https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twae062.
Pelekos G, Acharya A, Tonetti MS, Bornstein MM. Diagnostic performance of cone beam computed tomography in assessing peri-implant bone loss: A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2018;29:443–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13143.
Queiroz PM, Oliveira ML, Groppo FC, Haiter-Neto F, Freitas DQ. Evaluation of metal artefact reduction in cone-beam computed tomography images of different dental materials. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:419–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2128-9.
Rossi M, Cerveri P. Comparison of supervised and unsupervised approaches for the generation of synthetic ct from cone-beam ct. Diagnostics 2021;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11081435.
Sawicki P, Zawadzki PJ, Regulski P. The Impact of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Exposure Parameters on Peri-Implant Artifacts: A Literature Review. Cureus 2022. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.23035.
Schulze R. CBCT artefact-burden of zirconia-based as compared to titanium implants for different beam energies: an analytical approach. Sci Rep 2022;12:15276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19379-y.
Schulze R, Heil U, Groß D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, et al. Artefacts in CBCT: A review. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology 2011;40:265–73. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/30642039.
Tang H, Lin YB, Jiang SD, Li Y, Li T, Bao XD. A new dental CBCT metal artifact reduction method based on a dual-domain processing framework. Phys Med Biol 2023;68. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/acec29.
Tarce M, de Greef A, Lahoud P, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. The impact of implant-related characteristics on dental implant blooming: An in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2022;33:1199–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.14002. Epub 2022 Oct 12. PMID: 36189488.
Vasconcelos T, Nascimento E, Bechara B, Freitas D, Noujeim M. Influence of Cone Beam Computed Tomography Settings on Implant Artifact Production: Zirconia and Titanium. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2019;34:1114–20. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.7129.
Wajer R, Wajer A, Kazimierczak N, Wilamowska J, Serafin Z. The Impact of AI on Metal Artifacts in CBCT Oral Cavity Imaging. Diagnostics 2024;14. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14121280.
Wanderley VA, de Faria Vasconcelos K, Leite AF, Pauwels R, Shujaat S, Jacobs R, et al. Impact of the blooming artefact on dental implant dimensions in 13 cone-beam computed tomography devices. Int J Implant Dent 2021;7:67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-021-00347-6.
